It seems hard for some Americans to understand why Iraqis might not be too happy with American soldiers in their country. But what would happen if we were occupied by military forces from other countries? How would we react? Would some of us side with the occupying force as a way to gain advantages? Would we start guerrilla warfare against the occupiers? Would people take advantage of the unrest to settle old feuds? Would gangs and drug lords help lead insurrections? It’s worth thinking about what things might look like if we were occupied.
Impossible you say. Aside from the fact of our great military strength, our geography also makes it extremely difficult for any other nation or group of nations to conquer us. Maybe. But what if we conquered ourselves?
Suppose that after the 2006 elections the Bush administration began to plot out their permanent control of the United States. They start making lists of generals who have been loyal and those who have questioned Rumsfeld and the Bush administration. Among the many documents captured in Iraq are Saddam Hussein’s strategy for holding power in Iraq, for stifling political dissent. Imagine how interesting that would be to Rumsfeld's replacement – an actual plan to quell the violence. How useful it would be to Karl Rove – an actual plan to stifle dissent. And one day Hussein is executed in Baghdad while Fox News and Al Jazeera cameras are running. Unbeknown to all but a few, the dead man is one of Saddam’s doubles, and the real Saddam is now safely hidden in Wyoming ranch where he can give advice on how he kept the relative peace in Iraq all those years and how the Bush administration can take care of the traitors in the military, in Congress, in the media, in academia. and elsewhere.
The list of suspect military is now expanded to all sectors of the population. Torture techniques have already been approved and we already have prisons where these techniques are practiced. Handy for finding out who’s loyal and who isn’t. Some get called up on morals charges – lots more illicit IM logs come to light. An aneurysm here, a car accident there, an attempted robbery. Slowly enemies disappear. Dark skinned men with beards. Gays. Atheists. Environmentalists. Parents of the dead or injured US troops who dared to question official reports. And anyone who stands up for any of these people. Life becomes more difficult. Air travel becomes an ordeal. Telephones make strange noises. Police put down ‘riots’ at hip-hop concerts and other events where undesirables gather. The dead and wounded brought it on themselves.
Things get murky. Journalists find out there are consequences for aiding and abetting the enemy with their traitorous stories and printing and broadcasting classified material – even if it is already publicly available. A string of explosions at military bases inside the United States is the last straw. The President mourns the loss of our courageous fighting men and women and vows to find and destroy the perpetrators of this outrage. The terrorist alert color scheme has now gone past red to purple. The media, even if they have connected the dots between the enemy lists and the bases destroyed, do not even think about reporting the story. With his loyalists now firmly in charge of all the military branches, and with Blackwater mercenaries deployed to potential hotspots, Bush declares martial law. There are curfews in place. People don't come back from foraging for food. But staying home isn't safe either. All United Nations personnel from countries that have not supported the United States in at least 90% of all votes, and 100% of all votes the Bush administration deems critical, are ordered to leave the country in 24 hours. US troops then take over the United Nations headquarters in New York.
Germany, Holland, and Denmark are the first European countries to break off diplomatic relations with the US. Most Muslim countries also cut ties. The Chinese and the Russians are both nervous and smiling. They always knew that democracy couldn’t work. They understand dictators much more than they understand democrats. Across the nation there is panic. Most of the people who own guns and know how to use them are siding with the government. The liberals take to their computers and begin hacking the governments systems. In some cases they find and post internal documents and plans. In other cases they are able to shut down vital systems. The power goes out in Washington DC and the surrounding areas. Troops occupy Microsoft, Google, and other critical computer centers and internet use is severely restricted.
The disruption to trade caused by the United States crisis threatens to topple the world economy. NATO, minus the US, but with help from Russia and China, and dissident US generals and troops overseas, begin to meet to determine what to do. Pakistan, having broken all ties with the US, is now working closely with North Korea to nuke Alaska.
Bush rallies his support. A new Confederacy is authorized to establish a semi-autonomous region in the South, ruled by fundamentalist Christians. The insurgents - a mix of liberals, libertarians, and true conservatives - are using what internet is left to appeal for help from NATO. Many have slipped into Canada or Mexico to start resistance movements.
Do I think this might happen? Of course not. We live in the United States of America, with the oldest constitutional democracy in the world, a constitution that guarantees such things as freedom of speech, freedom from religious prosecution, habeas corpus, due process. But I just spin this scenario so people can start to imagine what life might be like for Iraqis. So people can start to imagine the kinds of choices they would have to make if our city’s streets were ruled by violent militia and you couldn’t count on the police for safety, or the markets for food, or the corner gas station for fuel. When electricity and running water can no longer be taken for granted.
What would your options be? How would you protect your home, your family? What would you do if someone got sick or hurt, but the hospitals were occupied by drug dealers and looters?
So, when NATO - including China and Russia - troops finally landed, what would you do? Would you volunteer to join the new police? Would you join up with your ethnic, religious, or professional compatriots? Would you try to live as normal a life as possible? Would you try to flee across the border? Would you join the insurgency?
4 comments:
Hey Steve, pretty scary stuff here. You forgot about Fox news though. LOL The saddest part of all is that some of the scenario that you describe may arguably already have happened or is happening now. Just a couple of observations:
"That list of suspect military is now expanded to all sectors of the population. Torture techniques have already been approved and we already have prisons where these techniques are practiced. Handy for finding out who’s loyal and who isn’t Some get called up on morals charges – lots more illicit IM logs come to light. An aneurysm here, a car accident there, an attempted robbery. Slowly enemies disappear. Dark skinned men with beards. Gays. Atheists. Environmentalists. Parents of the dead or injured US troops who dared to question official reports. And anyone who stands up for any of these people."
I think you wanted "The list" at the top of the paragraph because the paragraph is far enough removed from the original reference that "that" seem awkward. Also "Handy for finding out who’s loyal and who isn’t Some get called up on morals charges", the period is missing between "isn't" and "Some".
Just one last thought, you might want to consider trimming a question or two from the end. If anyone hasn't gotten your point by the end then I doubt the extra questions are going to help. On the other hand, those of us who do get your point, don't need the excessive list. Thanks for this. Sobering stuff. Cheers!
Nice bit of writing there, though I don't live in America, Ireland to be precise, I agree with it.
One thing i noticed that you ended it pretty much all in questions. I know rules are meant to be broken, but I was taught from my English teacher early on that essays were not meant to be ended with questions but rather leave the reader with an opinion or idea to hold onto. Of course it can't be taken face value, but I think it helps not to have too many questions at least.
Overall cheers for this.
Thanks both of you. I'll make the corrections you mentioned in that paragraph bp.
RP, I don't remember a rule about not asking a question at the end. I've come to believe that the best way to convince someone is to engage them through getting them to examine how they think about something. So asking questions at the end is an attempt to make them active, not just passive readers. But I hear both of you and as I reread the questions it makes sense to cut out "Would you believe they were our liberators? Or that they were taking advantage of our national calamity to take what they could?" because these are more abstract. The rest specifically ask the readers what they would do .
But maybe I should ask you. PB, did you think about what you would do? RP, maybe you didn't because you didn't see this as about you since you aren't a US citizen.
Again, thanks.
Did I reflect on those questions? Absolutely. Scary stuff as I mentioned earlier. I know you intended this piece to build empathy for the Iraqis which it certainly should, but sadly I fear your scenario is not impossible. Keep your passports handy out there. :(
Post a Comment